Am 08.03.2015 um 13:49 schrieb Togan Muftuoglu: >>>>>> "Roman" == Roman Lebedev <lebedev...@gmail.com> writes: > > Roman> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Pedro Côrte-Real > <pe...@pedrocr.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Togan Muftuoglu <tog...@opensuse.org> > >> wrote: > >> > And based on what message you are saying it is a broke package. For > >> all it was > said dt doesn't work. > >> > >> It was a guess. I asked for the output to know for sure. We've had > >> plenty of bug reports caused by those kinds of build issues so it > >> seemed like a reasonable possibility. > >> > >> > Also looks like you don't understand how package systems work be it > >> rpm based > or deb based let alone how packages are build in openSUSE > >> OBS. "rm -fr build" or > cleaning the "make install" destination are > >> nonsense in this case > >> > >> I know nothing of openSUSE OBS, maybe it always builds from a clean > >> state, it would certainly make sense. It's perfectly possible to need > >> to "rm -fr build" if you're building a deb or rpm by hand. > >> > Roman> Even though it always does a clean build, it does not mean that it > Roman> is guaranteed that OBS does not apply some obscure patches and/or > Roman> compile with some weird optimization flags. Just thinking out > loud. > > we remove squish library sources from the source tarball due to patent > problems no patches are applied > > CFLAGS used are > > -fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g > -fno-strict-aliasing > > But the real truth is we do not know the error messages and the versions of > related libraries/programs installed to the OP system. So unless there are > facts everything else is gibberish
I think you read my reply with the output I got after I started DT 1.6.3-99.1 from terminal. Now I tried the following: I uninstalled this version (as provided by OBS Multimedia:Photo) and tried to install 1.6.3-89.1 (from OBS Graphics). I get this warning: Darktable-1.6.3-89.1.x86_64 benötigt libgphoto2_port.so.12()(64bit), was aber nicht angeboten werden kann. Nicht installierbare Anbieter: libgphoto2-6-2.5.7-145.1.x86_64[openSUSE_BuildService_-_Graphics] Konfliktlösung: libgphoto2-6-2.5.7-145.1.x86_64 installieren (mit Anbieterwechsel) openSUSE --> obs://build.opensuse.org/graphics Architekturwechsel von kio_kamera-14.12.2-12.1.x86_64 zu kio_kamera-14.12.2-12.1.i586 Architekturwechsel von gvs-backends-1.22.2-4.1.x86_64 zu gvs-backends-1.22.2-4.1.i586 + 47 weitere I didn't accept and reinstalled 1.6.3-99.1 which needs libgphoto2_port.so.10, which is provided by libgphoto2-6-2.5.5.1 in my system. Can I help with more information? Volker ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
