datetime-sig  

Messages by Date

• 2015/08/25 Re: [Datetime-SIG] time module issues Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/25 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Akira Li
• 2015/08/25 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/25 [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Stuart Bishop
• 2015/08/25 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/25 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Akira Li
• 2015/08/25 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Stuart Bishop
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Akira Li
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Stuart Bishop
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 Q & A Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Post-PEP 495 ideas Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Stuart Bishop
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Tim Peters
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500 Stuart Bishop
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Stuart Bishop
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Chris Angelico
• 2015/08/24 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Tim Peters
• 2015/08/23 [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Tim Peters
• 2015/08/23 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Stuart Bishop
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Stuart Bishop
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 Q & A Tim Peters
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 Q & A Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 Q & A Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 Q & A Tim Peters
• 2015/08/22 [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 Q & A Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500 Tim Peters
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500 Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500 Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500 Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Timezone database Was: PEP-431/.. Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Chris Barker
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Chris Barker
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/22 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
• 2015/08/21 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/21 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/21 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/21 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Tim Peters
• 2015/08/21 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/21 [Datetime-SIG] PEP-431/495 Stuart Bishop
• 2015/08/20 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
• 2015/08/20 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Łukasz Rekucki
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Tim Peters
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Tim Peters
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Tim Peters
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Chris Barker
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Chris Barker
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Chris Barker
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Chris Barker
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Chris Barker
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Chris Barker
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Tim Peters
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Tim Peters
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/19 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Akira Li
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Tim Peters
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Tim Peters
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Tim Peters
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Tim Peters
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Felipe Ochoa
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Tim Peters
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Tim Peters
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/18 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Tim Peters
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Tim Peters
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Tim Peters
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-0500 (Alternative datetime arithmetic) Was: PEP 495 ... is ready ... Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Chris Barker
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Carl Meyer
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Ethan Furman
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Chris Barker
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Chris Barker
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Chris Barker
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Chris Barker
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Alexander Belopolsky
• 2015/08/17 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Łukasz Rekucki
• 2015/08/16 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Tim Peters
• 2015/08/16 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Guido van Rossum
• 2015/08/16 Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 (Local Time Disambiguation) is ready for pronouncement Guido van Rossum

• Earlier messages
• Later messages