Dear Prof. Bangerth, May I continue this topic, for shell problems, shall we better use* IGA* (more faster & more robust ... vs Mixed formulation)?
Best, Yaakov On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 10:13:24 AM UTC+1, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > > > Shawn, > > > I tried to search but did not find an implementation of shell elements > in > > deal.II. Since this is a commonly used element, I'd like to make sure > that > > it's not me missing it. Could you please help confirm? > > That depends on how exactly you define "shell elements". But if you mean > "elements that are not only continuous but also have continuous > derivatives, > for use in problems with fourth derivatives", then the answer is "no". > > Of course, there are other approaches to solve shell problems -- maybe > even > better ones than using shell elements -- that are available in deal.II. > This > includes using mixed methods. > > Best > W. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wolfgang Bangerth email: bang...@colostate.edu > <javascript:> > www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ > > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
