On 22/01/18 17:23, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:28:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Chris Boot <bo...@debian.org> (2018-01-22): >>> I think it would be helpful to start using Salsa for some of our repos. >>> >>> I would like to move my personal busybox work-in-progress repo to Salsa; >>> I know nothing prevents me from doing that but it feels like everything >>> would be more joined-up if the main busybox repo was also in Salsa and >>> in a debian-boot team/group. >> >> If you have time/motivation to explore salsa.debian.org for d-i things, >> that's more than welcome!
Well, I was going to do so only as far as my involvement goes. Since I'm only really involved in busybox, I was looking at bootstrapping the team and putting busybox there. I don't want to barge in and push anyone else into things they may not yet be ready for, so I was planning on leaving the rest to other people. [snip] >>> What should it be called? >> >> Good question. d-i looks good to me, and would match the current group >> on alioth. debian-boot is historical and I think we should keep only >> the list named this way (along with IRC). > > Or just use "installer-team". I don't mind d-i-team or installer-team or even debian-installer-team, but the self-service interface always adds "-team" to the end. Not having -team on the end presumably means asking the admin folks to do it manually for us, so it's probably best avoided unless we really want to. >>> Should its membership just be copied from the Alioth team? >> If possible, that would look good to me. Not sure about non-DD accounts >> support though (I've had too little time to keep track of salsa things, >> which seemed to be fast moving). > > This just needs to be done by hand. Indeed, non-DD accounts need to register at https://signup.salsa.debian.org/ and then a DD needs to add them to the relevant team/project with appropriate permissions. [snip comments about SVN migrations and using the Debian umbrella] Cheers, Chris -- Chris Boot bo...@debian.org
