Hi Julian, On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:58:56 +0100, Julian Gilbey <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:05:05AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: >> >> What comes to my mind are: >> * Don't you installed beta version of STIX fonts >> by accidents? > > As far as I can tell, not since Jun 18 2010, when I upgraded from > 0.9~2007.10.31-5 -> 1.0.0-1. Okay. >> * It will be irrelevant but aren't there any TeX fonts >> (ttf/otf/type1 ...) which xserver or iceweasel might >> recognize and might prevent STIX fonts to be used? >> (cm-super and lmodern are irrelevant with my check) > > It's possible, but I doubt it, somehow. I agree. > Another possible thought: which website were you using for your test? > Perhaps there are different versions of MathJax installed which cause > the difference? I tested with "http://www.mathjax.org/"; I received the report: TeX on only one of my Debian machine in which I installed obsolete private STIX fonts package. I built that package for test before official upload (with version 2007.10.31-0.1 so it was not upgraded automatically ;-). After manual upgrade of otf-stix, I received the report: STIX even on that machine. And now I can distiguish TeX and STIX fonts with a shape of "x" ;-) Regards, 2010-10-28(Thu) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
