Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug#254598: Name of the Debian x86-64/AMD64 port]"): > Pretty much all of these lead me to conclude that we should resolve > along the following lines:
I was slightly unclear about whether that was a formal proposal, and in any case didn't call for a vote. But people seem to like it so I hereby propose the following resolution, and call for a vote: The Technical Committee have considered the question of the name of the Debian x86-64/AMD64 port. We resolve that: * In our opinion the porting team are the right people to be deciding on the architecture name, in general. * In our opinion there is no significant technical reason to interfere with the porting team's decision; on the contrary, we largely agree with the porting team's choice of `amd64'. * In our opinion architecture names with underscores in should not be used because of the existing use of underscore as a separator in package filenames, etc.; accordingly we advise that these should be avoided. * Since names with hyphens in are currently only used when separating variant kernel-processor combinations, we advise that this practice should be continued. * Therefore, insofar as we are granted any authority by the constitution, we uphold the porting team's choice of `amd64'. * We request that dpkg should be changed to use `amd64'. Should the dpkg maintainers decline, we will seek clarification of the Constitution and consider using our powers in 6.1(1), 6.1(2) or 6.1(4) to overrule the dpkg maintainers. Ian.