* Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 07:49:22AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > I don't see this as a technical issue and I don't believe the tech > > committee has any jurisdiction over it. > > The technical committee can be brought in on non-technical issues when > asked to resolve them.
I don't see it as appropriate or logical for the technical committee to
have the final say on non-technical issues, regardless of if they're
asked them or not. If they'd like to share their opinion, that's nice,
but very different.
> > There's probably good reason that in the past and in general the porters
> > are the ones who pick the arch name.
>
> Probably.
>
> I'm not sure how you're going to go forward with your "refuse to
> cooperate" idea if the technical committee happens to decide that
> you're right. But I'll let you worry about that one.
It'd be a no-op, of course. I didn't say I'd go against the committee
regardless of thier decision but that I'd ignore it.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
