> * Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 07:49:22AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > > I don't see this as a technical issue and I don't believe the tech > > > committee has any jurisdiction over it.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > The technical committee can be brought in on non-technical issues when > > asked to resolve them. > > I don't see it as appropriate or logical for the technical committee to > have the final say on non-technical issues, regardless of if they're > asked them or not. If they'd like to share their opinion, that's nice, > but very different. There's actually two points of potential relevance: [1] When something is within someone's jurisdiction, they can ask the technical committee to make a specific decision. [2] When jurisdictions overlap, the technical committee can make a decision. What I think you're saying is that developer A can't meaningfully ask the technical committee to make a decision which is within developer (or developer group) B's jurisdiction when the issue is not within developer A's jurisdiction. And, I agree. [That's a bit long, mostly because the phrases are so big, but I think it's clear enough.] -- Raul
