On 3/2/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:35:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > But I think this case -- <<where root privileges are needed, in order to > > install non-free software, in order to make the package work the way that > > people typically think of as using it>>... I think this case is on the wrong > > side of that line. > > But by its nature ndiswrapper requires root privs, and this would be true > even if we were bundling a free driver with it. So I don't think that's the > right line here, either...
I said A, B, C You said A (without B and C). I don't think these are comparable, even though they use some of the same words -- Raul
