On 28 Feb 2006, Anthony Towns stated:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:09:35PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> WHEREAS
>> 1. ndiswrapper's purpose is to allow non-free drivers to be used.
>> THE COMMITTEE CONCLUDES THAT
>> 6. ndiswrapper belongs in contrib.
>> AND THE COMMITTEE THEREFORE REQUESTS AS FOLLOWS
>> 9. ftpmasters and the ndiswrapper maintainers should cooperate to
>> move
>> nsidwrapper to contrib. [...]
>> 10. The Policy Manual maintainers should take steps to adjust the
>> language regarding main and contrib to clarify and improve it. [...]
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:30:33PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
>> WHEREAS
>> 1. ndiswrapper's purpose is to allow non-debian (and typically
>> non-free)
>> drivers to be used.
>> THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT
>> 6. ndiswrapper belongs in contrib.
>> AND THE COMMITTEE THEREFORE REQUESTS AS FOLLOWS
>> 9. ftpmasters and the ndiswrapper maintainers should cooperate to move
>> nsidwrapper to contrib.
>
> Okay, so I'll vote against both these.
As do I.
manoj
--
So we follow our wandering paths, and the very darkness acts as our
guide and our doubts serve to reassure us.- Jean-Pierre de Caussade,
eighteenth-century Jesuit priest
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
