On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:49:32AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 09:40, Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 07:40:00AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
>> >
>> >The core issue as I see it is as follows:
>> >
>> >- Debian has decided to support only merged-/usr, including possibly
>> >  moving /bin/sh to /usr/bin/sh or using /usr/lib*/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>> >  as the interpreter in binaries.
>> WTF? *Nobody* has been talking about breaking ABI like this, that I've
>> seen. The interpreter must *not* be changed willy-nilly.
>Nothing's happening 'willy-nilly'. We are discussing a bunch of
>seemingly crazy options, as in, "what would _actually_ explode if we
>do this or do that?", on this very d-devel thread. I posted a longer
>version here some days ago:

Oh holy fuck.

You're talking about changing ABI by doing this. That *is* utterly
crazy. No.

Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                st...@einval.com
"...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user'
 as meaning someone who's only ever written one device driver." -- Daniel Pead

Reply via email to