Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's completely unfounded bullshit.
Do you have a specific complaint? Or is every single sentence in that post "unfounded bullshit"? > Whether you prefer a pyramid or lots of commiters style organization > is pretty much a personal or rather community organizational issue. Yes, and Greg is saying that a pyramidal structure doesn't work well, and that bitkeeper doesn't really have many advantages unless you are using a pyramidal structure. > Both have their up- and downsides. All the actual arguments he > presents are totally unfounded, All of them? Really? ALL of them? You're speaking about someone with considerable expertise in release management, you know... > abd besides that bitkeeper as the > specific SCM he mentions supports multiple commiters style > development just fine - for bkbits.net projects for example you can > add multiple ssh keys and thus let different people push to the same > repository. It's as if you didn't bother reading what he wrote, like where he says, "Of course, Bitkeeper can still work with centralized project management..." Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
