On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:32:21PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > On 6/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >NO! > > > >unstable is meant for packages that should be in the next stable > >release, as such only packages that are in the maintainer's opinion > >ready to migrate to testing should be uploaded to unstable. > > > >experimental is playground, uploading packages to experimental if one > >is not sure they are good candidates for testing is what people > >should do. > > I believe we all know and read the official documents we can diverge > about how people are actually using the branches, but that's not the > point.
This is not a matter of opinion; both experimental and unstable have a clear and well-defined meaning. Using either in a different way than what they are intended to do will *break* Debian. Don't do that. If people use experimental incorrectly, then that's a bug. It certainly isn't something we should be happy or even encouraging. -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]