Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > main. We argued that this was not allowed under the social contract and > the DFSG, and in the end people were forced to agree. I am now arguing > that the social contract gives us no right to engage in this form of > historical practice - given the current wording of the social contract, > I think you'll find it difficult to argue otherwise.
OK. What course of action do you advocate? So far I hear you telling other people they're wrong -- useful if they are, not so useful if they're the least wrong of all possible arguments -- but I haven't heard what you'd like to do about the firmware issue. -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
