2008/9/3 Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/9/3 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>> I don't see a conflict with the dissident test either; [...] >>> >>> I'm not sure it does either, although I note that both Savannah and >>> Sourceforge (for example) have terms that require one's real name. >>> Which services allow anonymous hosting? >> >> I just found a few. Sharesource.org and Intuxication.org only require >> an email address (Sharesource.org has a field for name, but you can >> leave it blank), and intuxication.org doesn't even require the email >> address to be valid (I just registered right now with [EMAIL PROTECTED]). The >> service freehg.org doesn't require any of these. Alternatively, you >> can always put a pseudonym in the name fields. > > Would you consider that anonymous enough to pass the dissident test?
In this case, yes. If you provide a network interface that the dissident's government can see, then you've already revealed possession of the program itself. You can exclude access to certain undesirables by hiding the network interface behind a password authentication system. This is no different than having to distribute source to fellow dissenters if you give them a modified binary on a CD. - Jordi G. H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
