2008/9/3 Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If being usable in an SSH session counts as "supporting" remote > interaction "through a computer network", then basically every program > supports such interaction!
You're right, ssh was a bad example, probably not covered by clause 13. > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:27:14 -0500 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > >> Also, instead of providing a link to where the source can be found, >> the embedded device's network interface could say "contact this >> person, this group, meet me at the docks at 4 AM, come alone" and then >> that other contact could provide the source over a network, since all >> the device has to offer is an "opportunity". > > I don't think that (currently) qualifies as "standard or customary > means of facilitating copying of software"... I was joking when I said the docks part, but a link saying "contact us, we'll get you the source" and that link actually takes you to a place where the source can eventually be found, maybe after talking with humans, does seem like a more or less customary method of distribution (not sure about the humans in between bit). - Jordi G. H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
