Thanks Riley and Ángel! Ángel,
The copyright notices in headers should be considered as priority over licenses inside generical files. So, the upstream intents provided by generical copyright files shouldn't be considered when packaging and if the files have headers. I understood your words, but the main license is non-DFSG (IMHO). Thanks a lot for your help! Regards, Eriberto 2015-10-18 19:06 GMT-02:00 Ángel González <keis...@gmail.com>: > I have to agree with the interpretations of the given text. > > However, in addition to the license in the README file, it also comes with > COPYING > and COPYING.LESSER files with the text of GPL and LGPL, which seems to imply > they > wanted to allow distributing the program under (L)GPL. > Seems worth a clarification by the copyright owner, those may be old > copyright notices, > and they are probably willing to relicense. > > That may not be possible for Contrib/mfix/test.ps, but that file could be > stripped. > > >
