On 17741 March 1977, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Did we discuss this license?
Doesn't seem to be too useful to discuss? It's clearly not compatible
with Debian main requirements.
Quoting the core variant below for ease of review. It looks
challenging
from a DFSG-perspective to me.
It very much is not a challenge, the whole ethical standards, while
sounding good, makes it entirely non-free.
The whole "freedom" part that's important for us is incompatible with
the - possibly useful goal - that they try to get with their ethical
standards.
--
bye, Joerg
