anatoly techtonik schrieb:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Adam <adam.schmalho...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> This is a topic for debian-legal not debian-pyhton. Discuss it with them
>> (after looking at the archive), as they are the experts. If there are
>> problems (= results) that can be brought here again.
>
> The point is to make Python Policy clear without additional consulting
> from Debian lawyers. I understand that most of us do not want to deal
> with these issues, but it will only do good if people won't have any
> questions after reading the policy.
>
> Questions like "Debian Python Policy is all about GPL. Do I have to
> release my Python package under GPL?". Most people (as you clearly
> expressed) don't care, so upstream maintainers would just avoid Debian
> packaging and let it do by someone else.
>
CC-By-Sa as you have suggested is a copyleft license as well so why
would one not ask "Do I need to publish my python stuff now under
CC-By-Sa" if one isn't sure about GPL? And having read both licenses I
fail to see where the CC license is easier to read (in the relevant
legalcode) as the GPL
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
