Le 1 octobre 2015 00:25:55 GMT+02:00, Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmin...@gmail.com> a écrit : >On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue <be...@crans.org> >wrote: >> On mer. 30 sept. 2015 à 23:13:26, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >>> [Thomas Goirand, 2015-09-30] >>> > Piotr decided to remove me from the Python team. >>> >>> DPMT and PAPT to be precise, yes >>> >>> > is an over reaction and that it should be reverted. >>> >>> I talked with you many times in private about your involvement in >the >>> teams over last ~3 years and since I kind of forced other admins >into >>> accepting you, I also take all the blame for removing you. >>> As I said in the private mail earlier today, if you still want to >work >>> with me, I'm happy to review / sponsor your commits in DPMT or help >with >>> any problems you might have with tools I wrote. >> >> Dear Piotr, >> >> Even if I'm not in the team and thus I do not decide of anything, I >> wonder if that's an appropriate answer, regarding the initial >trouble. >> >> We are currently talking about preventing Thomas to maintain his >> packages that has DPMT as maintainer, because he uploaded something >in >> experimental, which is neither a release, nor a distro of any kind. >> >> Considering the potential trouble it'll lead to (as for an example >it'll >> probably send my attempt to package mailman3 to nowhere), and the >> potential bad consequences for python team (some packages no longer >> maintained, etc), does it worth it? >> >> -- >> PEB > >Pierre, > >I'm new to the team, mailing list, etc. (honestly, I never had a >chance to formally introduce myself to everyone) but it looks as if >Piotr has had several instances in the past where he's had to >discipline Thomas. I doubt this is an action that Piotr took lightly. >Further, I doubt those packages will suddenly go unmaintained. > >Please continue working on mailman3, it will benefit the community far >more than the outcome of this apparent disciplinary action. > >Cheers, >Ian
Dear Ian, I do not intend to stop working on it, but even if it is not the first time (I hope no one would take such an action for one isolated mistake), I strongly beleive that such removal from a team where mostly anyone is supposed to be at a same level should be calmly discussed and debated with mostly everybody of the team in order to reach a consensus. This decision looks like something decided just after an aggressive discussion about something which does not look that bad from where I sit. Wouldn't taking some time to think before this removal had been a better idea for everybody? Peace, love and cheers. -- PEB