Le 1 octobre 2015 00:25:55 GMT+02:00, Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmin...@gmail.com> 
a écrit :
>On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue <be...@crans.org>
>> On mer. 30 sept. 2015 à 23:13:26, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>>> [Thomas Goirand, 2015-09-30]
>>> > Piotr decided to remove me from the Python team.
>>> DPMT and PAPT to be precise, yes
>>> > is an over reaction and that it should be reverted.
>>> I talked with you many times in private about your involvement in
>>> teams over last ~3 years and since I kind of forced other admins
>>> accepting you, I also take all the blame for removing you.
>>> As I said in the private mail earlier today, if you still want to
>>> with me, I'm happy to review / sponsor your commits in DPMT or help
>>> any problems you might have with tools I wrote.
>> Dear Piotr,
>> Even if I'm not in the team and thus I do not decide of anything, I
>> wonder if that's an appropriate answer, regarding the initial
>> We are currently talking about preventing Thomas to maintain his
>> packages that has DPMT as maintainer, because he uploaded something
>> experimental, which is neither a release, nor a distro of any kind.
>> Considering the potential trouble it'll lead to (as for an example
>> probably send my attempt to package mailman3 to nowhere), and the
>> potential bad consequences for python team (some packages no longer
>> maintained, etc), does it worth it?
>> --
>> PEB
>I'm new to the team, mailing list, etc. (honestly, I never had a
>chance to formally introduce myself to everyone) but it looks as if
>Piotr has had several instances in the past where he's had to
>discipline Thomas. I doubt this is an action that Piotr took lightly.
>Further, I doubt those packages will suddenly go unmaintained.
>Please continue working on mailman3, it will benefit the community far
>more than the outcome of this apparent disciplinary action.

Dear Ian,

I do not intend to stop working on it, but even if it is not the first time (I 
hope no one would take such an action for one isolated mistake), I strongly 
beleive that such removal from a team where mostly anyone is supposed to be at 
a same level should be calmly discussed and debated with mostly everybody of 
the team in order to reach a consensus.

This decision looks like something decided just after an aggressive discussion 
about something which does not look that bad from where I sit.

Wouldn't taking some time to think before this removal had been a better idea 
for everybody?

Peace, love and cheers.

Reply via email to