Hello, On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:24 PM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > Nice! Thanks a lot for the pointer.
\o/ > I very much agree with you that the debate has to be emptied from > emotions if possible. My goal has never been to point finger at anyone, > but try to fix a reoccurring situation which I would like to avoid. Definitely! Everyone would love to avoid that! > Running the script shows that 279 reverse (build?) dependencies are > affected by mock. This clearly isn't something one wants to run on a > personal computer, and even less a test which one wants to run sequentially. Haha, right. What we (me and a couple others) do is run this build script on a server (via screen) and call it a night :P And we get the list of broken packages in the morning! But of course, this is not a very "professional" way of doing it. > Has any thought went into having some kind of runners running on a cloud > to run these tests, and maybe plug this into Salsa's CI to run it > automatically? This seems to be a nice idea! I am not sure if someone had the time or energy to do this, but this is something we'd definitely love \o/ > I'd very much would love to set this up, at least as a first > experimentation on a bunch of package of the DPMT. Me too! Best, Utkarsh