On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 08:20:00AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 2 September 2017 at 14:57, Steve Cotton wrote: > | On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:03:06PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > So I continue to argue [2] that we should rebuild these 46, not force all > 516. > | > | If I may ask, "why?". > > Because R 3.4.1 is blocked from entering testing.
I should have been more specific with my question. If I may ask, "why do you want to spend the developer time to rebuild only 46 packages, when there's already an infrastructure that does it for you, at the cost of rebuilding all 516"? Regards, Steve
