On Sat, Feb 7, 2026 at 10:44 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 06/02/2026 17:13, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 10:44 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > >> On 05/02/2026 13:43, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 1:39 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort < > [email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Dependencies needs to be rebuild accordingly. > >>>> > >>>> Have you tried to rebuild the rdeps locally? What are the results? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I tried yes, for the level 1 ros-urdf the log is: > >>> > >>> https://gist.github.com/j-rivero/dc4e407700f41fc814a19c5f6f3ade04 > >>> > >>> I'm also fighting to get ratt to build the different system level > >>> dependencies but the > >>> problem I found is that there is a chain of packages that needs to be > >>> rebuilt in order > >>> to get rid of the urdfdom 4.x packages being installed in the testing > >>> environment by > >>> others. For example, ros-robot-state-publisher is failing because it is > >>> using existing > >>> ros-urdf that needs to be rebuilt. > >>> > >>> Is there a way of making that cascade testing to work in an automated > >>> manner? > >> > >> I don't know. I would build each level, then add the resulting binaries > to > >> a > >> local repo that is used for the subsequent levels. > >> > >> I don't know if there's another, more automated way to do it. > >> > > > > I ended up building somo local system to do this. The results are good: > > > > ================================================================ > > TRANSITION TEST SUMMARY > > ================================================================ > > > > PACKAGE BUILD AUTOPKGTEST > > ------- ----- ----------- > > ros-collada-urdf pass no-tests > > ros-kdl-parser pass pass > > ros-robot-state-publisher pass pass > > ros-rviz pass no-tests > > ros-urdf pass pass > > urdfdom from-experimental n/a > > > > ================================================================ > > > > Totals: 6 packages > > Builds: 5 pass, 0 fail > > Tests: 3 pass, 0 skip, 2 no-tests, 0 badpkg, 0 fail > > > > > > I've also tested dart manually since it can freeze the whole machine if > > building without thread limitation. > > > > Everything is fine to my eyes. > > Nice, thanks for checking. Please go ahead. > Thanks Emilio. Packages uploaded to the unstable.
