El día 23 de julio de 2010 10:02, Camaleón <[email protected]> escribió: > > (...) > > ¿Alguna ventaja de "unstable" sobre "testing"? ¿Qué os inclina a elegir > una u otra? Supongo que si no veo ninguna diferencia entre ambas es > porque que me conviene instalar la versión "testing" ;-) >
En la web[1] de Debian hay una breve descripción de cada release: [2] Testing The code name for the next major Debian release after lenny is "squeeze". This release started as a copy of lenny, and is currently in a state called "testing". That means that things should not break as badly as in unstable or experimental distributions, because packages are allowed to enter this distribution only after a certain period of time has passed, and when they don't have any release-critical bugs filed against them. Please note that security updates for "testing" distribution are not yet managed by the security team. Hence, "testing" does not get security updates in a timely manner. [3] The unstable distribution (sid) "sid" is subject to massive changes and in-place library updates. This can result in a very "unstable" system which contains packages that cannot be installed due to missing libraries, dependencies that cannot be fulfilled etc. Use it at your own risk! Tengo SID instalado en una netbook Asus HD1000, la utilizo a diario y te puedo asegurar que nunca he tenido mayores problemas. La gran ventaja de SID es que uno puede hacer un seguimiento en la evolucion de la release a diario. E inclusive contribuir con feedback enviando fallos y bugs a los desarrolladores. [1] http://www.debian.org/releases/ [2] http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/ [3] http://www.debian.org/releases/unstable/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti�[email protected]
