|
I think
that misses the point of this thread: If I'm bouncing [or rejecting outright]
mail from a host or domain, then they have no appeal recourse unless I can open
up a safe channel for _SOME_ mail to flow through.
On the
other hand, I have abuse@mydomains and postmaster@mydomains both whitelisted and
all I get are SPAM solicitations from hosting providers I wouldn't leave
Michael Jackson's kids with, much less my domains.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2002 3:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should postmaster or abuse accept all e-mail? It
has been my findings that most spam that really needs to be deleted comes from
servers that have neither a postmaster@ or abuse@. Personally, I feel its a
waste of resources to try and bounce it back to those addresses. If they have no
A / MX record and are on a blacklists, they need to be completely ignored
:).
Respectfully, -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darrell L. Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should postmaster or abuse accept all e-mail? Marc,
We actually whitelist the following addresses
WHITELIST TO postmaster@ WHITELIST TO abuse@
For the mentioned reasons below.
Darrell
-----Original
Message-----
I've been using the delete action on a blacklist test for Junkmail. I also have a few ip ranges blocked. I was thinking that if anyone with any brains figured out that they were blocked that maybe they would e-mail postmaster or abuse. Should I have a separate junkmail file for one or both of these address that allows all mail through? This way there is an appeal process. Is there an RFC for this?
Thanks - Marc |
Title: Message
- [Declude.JunkMail] Should postmaster or abuse accept all... Marc Catuogno
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Should postmaster or abuse a... R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should postmaster or abuse a... Darrell L.
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should postmaster or abu... pholmes
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should postmaster or... John Shacklett
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should postmaster or... John Tolmachoff
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should postmaste... Phillip B. Holmes
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should post... John Tolmachoff
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should ... Michael
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should ... Phillip B. Holmes
- [Declude.JunkMail] Wired: ... Roger Heath
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sho... John Tolmachoff
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sho... Phillip B. Holmes
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sho... Darin T. Cox
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sho... Todd Ryan
