That would be nice, I'm surprised by their undocumented methods though. My dealings with them have been quite good as they delisted our old server very quickly after several people submitted a mailing of ours.
It's a wonder that more people don't submit mail maliciously if the system works as it appears. Jools On Fri, 30 May 2003 10:26:37 -0400, you wrote: > >> Now in their defense I will say they are pretty good about >> responding to my messages and they have always done the right >> thing. But it is still time consuming and disruptive to have to >> investigate each incident. Their system is much too easily used >> for malicious purposes. > >What Spamcop really needs to do is have the TXT record include the % of >spam-to-legit E-mail, and their modified % (based on how recent the spam >was, etc.). From that, programs like Declude JunkMail could let you choose >exactly when to block the E-mail. I'm guessing that with better settings, >you might reduce the amount of spam that is caught by a couple percent, but >would virtually eliminate the false positives. > > -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
