I'm reading this thread, (I think it's come up before) and I'm really not sure what all the concern is about. I understand documentation for the current (release) version is posted on the Declude site, and Scott as well as many of the other participants on the list (did I mention Scott?) do an excellent and timely job keeping the community informed.

I really don't expect to be 100% informed about beta features. It's commendable that these features are discussed and supported to some degree in the of the forum. It's even more commendable interim (alpha?) releases are available.

Hats off to Scott and everyone else who provides support and makes the Declude a better product.
Happy T-day to all.


Thank you,
Burzin





At 11:52 AM 11/26/2003, you wrote:
If I may add my fifteen cents here...

It's only knowing that there is undocumented functionality available in an intermediate release to a beta that seems to be the issue. Normally most wouldn't even know about the features until the next full beta was released. Personally I'm happy to see pre-release functionality available so that more feedback can go into these tools prior to locking it down in a full beta release. I'm also quite happy to see problems fixed almost instantaneously in some cases.

It does seem that major functionality changes should probably be introduced in new beta versions instead of just interim releases so that users can choose whether to implement certain functionality instead of being forced to take both that and bug fixes that might be affecting them. The tradeoff here though is that you get fast updates and quicker access to new functionality this way. It seems in this case that the new functionality wasn't really intended to be announced, but was discovered by way of an honest answer to a question.

The only difference though between a beta and an interim release seems to be the supporting documentation, but again, using either a beta or an interim release is not recommended for normal use. If this was another company, you might wait months for a simple bug fix that gets bogged down by the system. I definitely don't want that, especially since I can choose to only use full releases.

I think we should all thank Scott for responding to the desires of his customers, wish him a happy Thanksgiving, and help each other out with questions such as this in lieu of the documentation (for the moment).

:)

Matt


Andy Schmidt wrote:


is this a new version of declude or something? <<


Things have gotten a bit messy, in my opinion.


It used to be that any FEATURE ADDITIONS would be done in a new beta version
and the fact that the features were added were listed in the 'readme'.

If a beta version needed fixing of newly created bugs, then there would be
intermediate releases for that particular beta.

Every once in a while, a beta would result in a new official release.

To my dismay, things have gotten a bit out of hand.  Now we have 20 or 30
intermediate releases - which in reality are several "new" betas, because
suddenly there are new features added between intermediate releases so that
any intermediate release has no resemblance to the original 'beta' with the
same version number.

Scott - can't we go back to a more easily trackable version numbering /
change mangement scheme?

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206

http://www.HM-Software.com/


-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Administration Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:08 PM To: Nick Hayer Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?


""I suggest you try the new feature in the latest intrim release"" is this a new version of declude or something? where can i get this?

ken

Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 10:37:48 AM, you wrote:

NH> Frederick -

NH> I suggest you try the new feature in the latest intrim release that NH> has these commands avail: SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT

NH> Place your compensatory filters [ones that reduce scoring] in the
NH> global config ahead of the other filter files.

NH> For me frankly most of my filters do not even now run - the dns NH> tests
NH> take care of the load so cpu use is way down

NH> -Nick



NH> From:               "Frederick Samarelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NH> To:                 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NH> Subject:            Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using
ramdrive?
NH> Date sent:          Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:44:37 -0500
NH> Send reply to:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]



I have some big filters and see very little disk access.

I don't think it would help.

What Delcude uses is CPU CPU CPU CPU .......


----- Original Message ----- From: "Gufler Markus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:21 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?




Hi all,

Anyone has experiences using a ramdrive for all declude exe, config and

filter files?


Markus


--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

(http://www.declude.com)]


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.





NH> ---
NH> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus NH> (http://www.declude.com)]


NH> ---
NH> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To NH> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type NH> "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at NH> http://www.mail-archive.com.
NH> ---
NH> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]






---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


------ Burzin Sumariwalla Phone: (314) 994-9411 x291 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (314) 997-7615 Pager: (314) 407-3345

Networking and Telecommunications Manager
Information Technology Services
St. Louis County Library District
1640 S. Lindbergh Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63131


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to