|
I
guess this goes towards where one chooses to draw the line - spammers vs.
"organizations supporting spammers". Someone who knowingly gets involved with a
spammer, should probably expect that their email will not longer be delivered
reliably.
Similar to blocking an infected/Zombie machine by IP. I do realize
that this machine could ALSO generate legitimate requests from my server - but
it is up to them to fix their problem so that the block can be
removed.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 02:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL
|
Title: Message
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamD/SpamC for Declude Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamD/SpamC for Declude Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamD/SpamC for Declude Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Bill Landry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Joshua Levitsky
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Joshua Levitsky
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Joshua Levitsky
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Topica and SBL Bill Landry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tests Used for Deleting? Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tests Used for Deleting? Bill Landry
