|
Sounds like a potential convert :) Here's something else that people should consider... The outer edge of a platter offers the best throughput by far. If you have say a 80 GB SATA drive, you can partition just 20 GB per drive in order to capture the best performance (considering that no single drive/function on a gateway should need any more than that). Under these conditions, you could get potentially much better performance than most SCSI drives can offer unless you were buying the largest and most expensive SCSI drives and using the same technique, which most of us would find prohibitive. ZipZoomFly.com sells the Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 ST380013AS 80GB Serial ATA 7200RPM Hard Drive w/8MB Buffer for $82 with free shipping. I could throw 6 of these in a box for next to nothing (figuratively). Western Digital is now also selling 10K SATA drives under their Raptor brand using spindle sizes mostly seen in SCSI offerings, but I'm not a big fan of their company, though they definitely outperform Seagate. http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductList.jsp?ThirdCategoryCode=011016 I'm actually planning on just going with single dedicated disks to start (small partitions) and when I need the performance boost, I will break it out into RAID 1. That should allow 3ware a little more time for their offering to mature. Can anyone help rate the incremental performance boost of having the page file on a separate drive, how about the log's? I don't figure the server should be doing much with the page file if it has enough memory and is dedicated to E-mail processing. I'm definitely going to put the OS on one and the spool on another, but I'm unsure about how useful the other two are. Matt Sanford Whiteman wrote:
-- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller Todd-Smart Mail
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller Frederick Samarelli
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller Kevin Bilbee
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller Adrian Hauri
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Cont... Sanford Whiteman
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Cont... Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Cont... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Control... Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Cont... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Control... Matt
