RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How accurate is SpamCop

[Shayne Embry]

Title: Message

Good point, Matt. And thanks to folks like you for putting in the time to look at these issues. I don't normally jump into these discussions, but seeing you mention a few of those domains earlier prompted me to act out of character and respond due to the problems I have had with them.   I just prefer to assign a higher score to SpamCop than what I perceive others to be doing, based on these posts. To each his/her own methods.   To clarify, I agree that deleting on a single test is NOT a good idea.   Shayne   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How accurate is SpamCop Shayne, They regularly list AOL and Road Runner mail servers too.  I was just giving you examples of what happened on one single day and what ended up getting held on my system.  It took multiple tests showing FP's in order for each message to get held. Here's some SpamCop detail on AOL's mail server's for instance:     http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=""> Note that they fare better than most large ISP's because they don't pump hardly any broadband customers out of these servers, and dial-up users are highly unlikely to get hijacked by a spammer. Matt