Sure looks like a freebie to me.  http://vil.nai.com/vil/virus-4d.asp

Is scan.exe a 32 bit app?

How do you update the pattern files?

Thanks!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nick Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot


> On 18 May 2004 at 13:56, Imail Admin wrote:
>
> > I'd like to second this question.  I remember seeing a couple of
> > discussions here where people couldn't agree on which McAfee product
> > to use as the command line scanner with Declude.  And, of course, the
> > online stores always emphasize the Windows-based products.  So exactly
> > which product is it that's needed?
> scan.exe - Mcafee's commandline scanner.
> Here is a link that I just found that has what appears to be a free
> copy:
> http://vil.nai.com/vil/virus-4d.asp
> DAILYSCAN.ZIP contains the scan.exe file.
> ]
> [We purchased ours but now maybe its a freebe..]
>
> -Nick Hayer
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ben
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "John Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 12:56 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot
> >
> >
> > > Do you have a CDW product number on this?  Called and they took
> > > forever to come back with $20+
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > John
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 9:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot
> > >
> > > On 17 May 2004 at 20:56, Aaron J. Caviglia wrote:
> > >
> > > > Where can we purchase the command line scanner?
> > > Aaron -
> > >
> > > If you are referring to the Mcafee one for $11 - Scott mentioned "My
> > > 1 year McAfee VirusScan Command Line license was $11 through CDW."
> > >
> > > We paid the same thing off of State contract from Insight.
> > >
> > > -Nick Hayer
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Aaron Caviglia
> > > >
> > > > On May 17, 2004, at 8:23 PM, Goran Jovanovic wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >> For the latter there is an outstanding request to Scott to kill
> > > > >> additional scanning once a scanner detects a virus..
> > > > >
> > > > > So right now if you use multiple scanners when you scan with
> > > > > ScannerA and it finds a virus Declude will still call ScannerB
> > > > > and have it scan as well?
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott pointed out that his McAfee was only $11.00 for the year
> > > > > so the price barrier is "non-existant" and I see from your and
> > > > > Scott's responses that there are indeed reasons to have more
> > > > > than one scanner.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you all
> > > > >
> > > > >      Goran Jovanovic
> > > > >      The LAN Shoppe
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
> > > > >> Hayer Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 10:03 AM To:
> > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
> > > > >> f-prot
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 17 May 2004 at 9:13, Goran Jovanovic wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> For the folks using multiple scanners, do you have any stats
> > > > >>> on how often the secondary scanner found a virus that the
> > > > >>> first one missed?
> > > > >> Hi Goran,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Here are my latest stats:
> > > > >> Virus Totals:
> > > > >>     441 F-Prot
> > > > >>     412 AVG
> > > > >>     446 McAfee
> > > > >> -----------------
> > > > >> Vunerabilities:
> > > > >> 349
> > > > >> -----------------
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I update the defs for all every 4 hrs on a staggered schedule.
> > > > >> Because of possible false positives I have found it hard to
> > > > >> rank one particular scanner over another. For me the advantage
> > > > >> to have more than one is one [varies] company will always come
> > > > >> out with protection for a new outbreak before another. The
> > > > >> downside is cost and cpu overhead. For the latter there is an
> > > > >> outstanding request to Scott to kill additional scanning once a
> > > > >> scanner detects a virus..
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Nick Hayer
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I realize that the cost of F-Prot (which I am using) is quite
> > > > >>> low
> > > > > and
> > > > >>> others might be as well, so it is not a cost issue but rather
> > > > >>> a "Do
> > > > > I
> > > > >>> really need it?".
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanx
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>      Goran Jovanovic
> > > > >>>      The LAN Shoppe
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >>>> [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > > > >>>> Scott Fisher Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 12:49 AM To:
> > > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
> > > > >>>> f-prot
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I find the Mcafee is the best at detecting viruses within
> > > > > encrupted
> > > > >>> zips.
> > > > >>>> Otherwise they are pretty even.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I'd recommend using F-Prot and Mcafee.
> > > > >>>> Mcafee for the DOS command line scanner is dirt cheap. I'll
> > > > >>>> see if
> > > > > I
> > > > >>> can
> > > > >>>> find my price tomorrow.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> <<< [EMAIL PROTECTED]  5/15 12:29p >>>
> > > > >>>> Can anyone tell me how f-prot compares to mcafee or symantec
> > > > >>>> when
> > > > > it
> > > > >>> comes
> > > > >>>> to keeping their database up with new viruses? That just
> > > > >>>> seems pretty cheap but hey that's exactly what I'm looking
> > > > >>>> for as long
> > > > > as
> > > > >>>> it works well
> > > > >>> :)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> thanks,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Larry Craddock
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> ---
> > > > >>>> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > > > >>>> (http://www.declude.com)]
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> ---
> > > > >>>> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > > > >>>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > > > >>>> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be
> > > > >>>> found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail
> > > > >>>> scanned for viruses
> > > > > by
> > > > >>>> Declude Virus]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ---
> > > > >>> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > > > >>> (http://www.declude.com)]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ---
> > > > >>> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > > > >>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > > > >>> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be
> > > > >>> found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ---
> > > > >> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > > > >> (http://www.declude.com)]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ---
> > > > >> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > > > >> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > > > >> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > > > >> at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail scanned for
> > > > >> viruses by Declude Virus]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > > > > (http://www.declude.com)]
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > > > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > > > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > > > > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > > > (http://www.declude.com)]
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
> > > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > > (http://www.declude.com)]
> > >
> > > ---
> > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > (http://www.declude.com)]
> > >
> > > ---
> > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com.
> > >
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to