Weird I didn't get any reply from you :( ? On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/27/11 5:03 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Roger Schildmeijer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 7/27/11 4:08 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Emmanuel >>>>>>> Lecharny<[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/27/11 3:31 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's just a matter to send a mail with the ICLA attached (I guess >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> be a scan or a picture of the ICLA with the written signature). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is not about how much time it takes to scan an ICLA and send it >>>>>>> :). >>>>>>> He was not in the initial list of committers and as the [VOTE] has >>>>>>> been accepted and closed and the podling has started I am afraid that >>>>>>> he should gain credits to become a committer. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure I follow why he should? (I have no doubt in Michele and if he >>>>>> continues to support deft the way he is currently doing he will >>>>>> probably >>>>>> become a committer one day.) >>>>> >>>>> I think that what Mohammad thinks is that it's not because you have >>>>> provided >>>>> a patch once before the project has been accepted at Apache that you >>>>> should >>>>> be granted commit access. >>>>> >>>>> The initial members of the project, listed in the proposal, are natural >>>>> committers. Any other should be voted by the PPMC (and approuved by the >>>>> IPMC), thus must gain access through merit. This is true for new >>>>> contributors, but also for those who contributed before. >>>>> >>>>> The rational for this rule is that if you didn't include them in the >>>>> proposal, then they haven't been 'committed' enough to the project. >>>>> >>>>> See >>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Authorize+Committers. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, I think that what is important here is to found the PPMC, as >>>>> they >>>>> will rule the project when it will get out of incubator. You are the >>>>> guy who >>>>> make this project successful - or not :-) -, and it's also a part of >>>>> the >>>>> process. >>>> >>>> That is *exactly* what I mean, I apologize if I was not clear enough :). >>> >>> np >>> . >>>> >>>> I already took the steps to activate the PPMC :). >>> >>> Nice initiative. :-) >> >> Yes, but I still don't see any replies, who are the moderator(s) of >> the deft-private@ ? I gave it a test and I am not one of them. > > I saw your mail, and I sent a response. I'm suppose to be moderator. > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > >
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour Author of (WebSphere Application Server Community Edition 2.0 User Guide) http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247585.html - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour - Blog: http://tadabborat.blogspot.com ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein "Writing clean code is what you must do in order to call yourself a professional. There is no reasonable excuse for doing anything less than your best." - Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship "Stay hungry, stay foolish." - Steve Jobs
