looks like a no for me :)
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Johnathan Meehan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did anybody reach out to [email protected] about this yet? > > On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 15:22 +0200, Roger Schildmeijer wrote: >> Yes, that sounds like a good idea. >> >> // Roger >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Julien Vermillard >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > IF is the key word here :) Are we supposed to raise the question on >> > [email protected] ? >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Roger Schildmeijer >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > If we really need to change the name, then that's the approach I would >> > > advocate. >> > > >> > > // Roger >> > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Séven Le Mesle <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> I agree on the on this point against AsyncWeb. >> > >> Maybe we can extend Deft name with a suffix or prefix :). >> > >> >> > >> Séven. >> > >> >> > >> 2011/8/19 Roger Schildmeijer <[email protected]> >> > >> >> > >> > I'm -1 on asyncweb. I agree with Niklas. The confusion would be >> > >> maximized. >> > >> > If we really have to change the name, then I guess we should start a >> > name >> > >> > survey. If it's avoidable I would be happy :) >> > >> > >> > >> > // Roger >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Niklas Gustavsson < >> > [email protected] >> > >> > >wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny < >> > >> [email protected] >> > >> > > >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > Not necessarily if asyncweb is merged into deft (and by merge, I >> > mean >> > >> > > > vanish...). >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I was more thinking of people who might actually know about asyncweb >> > >> > > and it's history. When all of a sudden a new code base occurs under >> > >> > > the same name, I think confusion would happen :-) >> > >> > > >> > > > >
