IF is the key word here :) Are we supposed to raise the question on [email protected] ?
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Roger Schildmeijer <[email protected]> wrote: > If we really need to change the name, then that's the approach I would > advocate. > > // Roger > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Séven Le Mesle <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree on the on this point against AsyncWeb. >> Maybe we can extend Deft name with a suffix or prefix :). >> >> Séven. >> >> 2011/8/19 Roger Schildmeijer <[email protected]> >> >> > I'm -1 on asyncweb. I agree with Niklas. The confusion would be >> maximized. >> > If we really have to change the name, then I guess we should start a name >> > survey. If it's avoidable I would be happy :) >> > >> > // Roger >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[email protected] >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny < >> [email protected] >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > > Not necessarily if asyncweb is merged into deft (and by merge, I mean >> > > > vanish...). >> > > >> > > I was more thinking of people who might actually know about asyncweb >> > > and it's history. When all of a sudden a new code base occurs under >> > > the same name, I think confusion would happen :-) >> > >
