Yes, that sounds like a good idea. // Roger
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Julien Vermillard <[email protected]>wrote: > IF is the key word here :) Are we supposed to raise the question on > [email protected] ? > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Roger Schildmeijer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > If we really need to change the name, then that's the approach I would > > advocate. > > > > // Roger > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Séven Le Mesle <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I agree on the on this point against AsyncWeb. > >> Maybe we can extend Deft name with a suffix or prefix :). > >> > >> Séven. > >> > >> 2011/8/19 Roger Schildmeijer <[email protected]> > >> > >> > I'm -1 on asyncweb. I agree with Niklas. The confusion would be > >> maximized. > >> > If we really have to change the name, then I guess we should start a > name > >> > survey. If it's avoidable I would be happy :) > >> > > >> > // Roger > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Niklas Gustavsson < > [email protected] > >> > >wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny < > >> [email protected] > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > Not necessarily if asyncweb is merged into deft (and by merge, I > mean > >> > > > vanish...). > >> > > > >> > > I was more thinking of people who might actually know about asyncweb > >> > > and it's history. When all of a sudden a new code base occurs under > >> > > the same name, I think confusion would happen :-) > >> > > >
