If we really need to change the name, then that's the approach I would advocate.
// Roger On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Séven Le Mesle <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree on the on this point against AsyncWeb. > Maybe we can extend Deft name with a suffix or prefix :). > > Séven. > > 2011/8/19 Roger Schildmeijer <[email protected]> > > > I'm -1 on asyncweb. I agree with Niklas. The confusion would be > maximized. > > If we really have to change the name, then I guess we should start a name > > survey. If it's avoidable I would be happy :) > > > > // Roger > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > Not necessarily if asyncweb is merged into deft (and by merge, I mean > > > > vanish...). > > > > > > I was more thinking of people who might actually know about asyncweb > > > and it's history. When all of a sudden a new code base occurs under > > > the same name, I think confusion would happen :-) > > > > > > /niklas > > > > > > > > > -- > Séven Le Mesle > Xebia IT Architects > > Email : [email protected] > Mobile : +33(0)1 46 91 76 16 > > http://www.xebia.fr > http://blog.xebia.fr > > Siège Social > La Défense Colisée > 10 / 12 Avenue de l'arche > Faubourg de l'Arche > 92419 Courbevoie Cedex >
