Cool On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > There is nothing formal, IMHO. > > Act as if you were already a TLP, so open a discussion for new names > proposals, and then a vote can be issued. > > It should be enough :) > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> :D >> >> Only a [VOTE] for the new name, and I think we MUST inform >> [email protected] about that when the voting is started. Metors any idea >> about whether there is a formal process for podling name change ? >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Roger Schildmeijer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Unfortunately I think you are right. A new [VOTE] thread is inevitable. >> > >> > // Roger >> > >> > >> > On Aug 24, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: >> > >> >> I agree with Emmanuel... >> >> >> >> I believe we should start looking for a new name. I propose to have >> >> another e-mail thread started by the development team to narrow the >> >> circle around the proposed names, and then we make a [VOTE] on the >> >> most selected one. Thoughts ? >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Frankly, [email protected] will say that we are incubating, and that the PPMC >> should >> >>> handle this issue. >> >>> >> >>> Now, the rational is that we would not like to have an issue when the >> >>> project is promoted to TLP. Such an issue can be some big company >> sending >> >>> The ASF a letter requesting us to change the project name. That would >> be not >> >>> only a legal annoyance, but also a problem if the project is >> established as >> >>> a TLP for a few month. >> >>> >> >>> Here, it's more about mitigating potential problems than to be legally >> >>> protected. Remember that legal.a.o is not there to tell us what's right >> and >> >>> wrong (you need to go to court for such decision) but to advise us >> about >> >>> what would be best for the project, legally wise. >> >>> >> >>> You still can send a mail to legal.a.o, it cost nothing. >> >>> >> >>> Now, if you have to pick a new name, just select something that either >> is >> >>> absolutely free (xarkily or tropqualu for instance), or a common name >> >>> associated with Apache, for instance Apache Asynchronous Web Framework >> (it's >> >>> just an example). >> >>> >> >>> Be smart :) >> >>> >> >>> On 8/24/11 9:48 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> looks like a no for me :) >> >>>> >> >>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Johnathan Meehan >> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Did anybody reach out to [email protected] about this yet? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 15:22 +0200, Roger Schildmeijer wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Yes, that sounds like a good idea. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> // Roger >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Julien >> >>>>>> Vermillard<[email protected]>wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> IF is the key word here :) Are we supposed to raise the question on >> >>>>>>> [email protected] ? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Roger Schildmeijer >> >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> If we really need to change the name, then that's the approach I >> would >> >>>>>>>> advocate. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> // Roger >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Séven Le Mesle<[email protected] >> > >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I agree on the on this point against AsyncWeb. >> >>>>>>>>> Maybe we can extend Deft name with a suffix or prefix :). >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Séven. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> 2011/8/19 Roger Schildmeijer<[email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I'm -1 on asyncweb. I agree with Niklas. The confusion would be >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> maximized. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> If we really have to change the name, then I guess we should >> start a >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> name >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> survey. If it's avoidable I would be happy :) >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> // Roger >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Niklas Gustavsson< >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> [email protected] >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny< >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not necessarily if asyncweb is merged into deft (and by merge, >> I >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> mean >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> vanish...). >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I was more thinking of people who might actually know about >> >>>>>>>>>>> asyncweb >> >>>>>>>>>>> and it's history. When all of a sudden a new code base occurs >> under >> >>>>>>>>>>> the same name, I think confusion would happen :-) >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Cordialement, >> >>> Emmanuel Lécharny >> >>> www.iktek.com >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks >> >> - Mohammad Nour >> >> ---- >> >> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep >> moving" >> >> - Albert Einstein >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> - Mohammad Nour >> ---- >> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" >> - Albert Einstein >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
