No it IS faster than win2k. I have due boot on my XP machine, and win2k is definitly slower. Ok, we are prob. not talking a LOT slower, but I do notice it. e.g. Load time of Delphi is I guess up to I suspect 4-5 if not more seconds faster on XP. I find its load time for most apps. is def. faster. Even Xp's startup and close down leaes win2k for dead !
In the 12mths or more (or it mightbe less I forget) I have had one bluse screenin XP, and that was self inflicted. Any talk of instability is prob. due to upgrading form win2k to xp which M$ dont even recommend. Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: Matt Dee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 02:48:33 +1300 Subject: Re: RE: [DUG]: XP versus NT > >I find XP generally no problems and not really any slower if you have > a > >fast machine > > > Erm.... So it is in fact slower than 2000? > > :-) > > Think I'll stick with 2000 for a while longer. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with body of "unsubscribe delphi" > Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body of "unsubscribe delphi" Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/
