On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 12:46 PM Richard Shann <rich...@rshann.plus.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 09:23 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > > There is a GNU/Linux AppImage here: > > http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/AppImage/denemo_2.2.3.AppImage > > > Oh! Now I understand - I guessed AppImage was short for Apple Image, > something to do with Macs but Wikipedia tells me it is for distro > independent packaging for GNU/Linux :) > That sounds good, I'll try it out tomorrow when the fix I put in today > can be tested. [this was days ago, it didn't work ...] > Oh. I made this snapshot days ago. I will try to update it today. I have yet to make this automated. I have some new hardware that should allow me to do this. To execute it you just download it. chmod +x. Then launch it like a binary. > > > It does not have any of the dependencies in the image. Should I > > package lilypond and all the dependencies even if they are in each > > distro anyway? > > What "dependencies"? Evince, librubberband, portaudio, etc... LilyPond, though not strictly speaking a > dependency will generally be wanted and packaging the version which > Denemo expects would avoid problems for beginners while not preventing > people using their own version. Do you have anything else in mind? > I thought we discussed having a skinny version that contained only denemo then a fat version containing all dependencies all the way down to libc and lilypond. Jeremiah > Sorry this email is so delayed, I thought it had gone and then found it > on my desktop hidden away :( > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Denemo-devel mailing list > Denemo-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel >
_______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list Denemo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
