On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 14:57 +0000, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 12:46 PM Richard Shann <rich...@rshann.plus.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 09:23 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > > > There is a GNU/Linux AppImage here: > > > http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/AppImage/denemo_2.2.3.AppImage > > > > > Oh! Now I understand - I guessed AppImage was short for Apple > > Image, > > something to do with Macs but Wikipedia tells me it is for distro > > independent packaging for GNU/Linux :) > > That sounds good, I'll try it out tomorrow when the fix I put in > > today > > can be tested. [this was days ago, it didn't work ...] > > Oh. I made this snapshot days ago. I will try to update it today. I > have yet to make this automated. I have some new hardware that should > allow me to do this. > > To execute it you just download it. chmod +x. Then launch it like a > binary. > > > > > > It does not have any of the dependencies in the image. Should I > > > package lilypond and all the dependencies even if they are in > > each > > > distro anyway? > > > > What "dependencies"? > > Evince, librubberband, portaudio, etc... > > > LilyPond, though not strictly speaking a > > dependency will generally be wanted and packaging the version which > > Denemo expects would avoid problems for beginners while not > > preventing > > people using their own version. Do you have anything else in mind? > > I thought we discussed having a skinny version that contained only > denemo then a fat version containing all dependencies all the way > down to libc and lilypond.
Yes, I thought we had agreed that - I'm not sure what the email that I sent (above) was still doing lurking on my desktop. I tested out the AppImage version and it ran fine against my Debian Stable libraries. A fat version with all dependencies would carry on working far into the future. Richard _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list Denemo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
