Myrna van Lunteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 1/16/08, Army <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Rick Hillegas wrote: >> >> > If I were to categorize issues according to the severity of >> > their impact, it would look something like this (in declining >> > order of significance): >> > >> > 1) Engine crashes >> > 2) Data corruption >> > 3) Wrong results >> > 4) Failures (e.g., a query just aborts) >> > 5) Misleading messages, typos, ugly formatting, ... >> > I would add to that list > Unintended regression of behavior/fixes. > (not sure of the priority of it, but I'm inclined to see it as 0).
I guess I see 'regression' as a separate dimension which increases the priority. In general I think all regressions should have higher priority than non-regressions, but I would not prioritize say, an unclear error message regression over a data corruption that is not a regression. > Also, maybe there are some items off Kathey's high value fix bugs that > can be fixed for 10.4. > http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/HighValueFixCandidates Thanks for posting the link. I'll bookmark it :) -- dt
