On 1/17/08, Dag H. Wanvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I guess I see 'regression' as a separate dimension which increases the > > priority. In general I think all regressions should have higher priority > > than non-regressions, but I would not prioritize say, an unclear error > > message regression over a data corruption that is not a regression. > > +1 > > Dag > Yes, I'll +1 to this prioritizing also. Myrna
- Regression Filter (was Re: Blockers an... Kathey Marsden
- Re: Regression Filter Dyre . Tjeldvoll
- Re: Regression Filter (was Re: Bl... Rick Hillegas
- Re: Regression Filter (was Re: Bl... Kathey Marsden
- Re: Regression Filter (was Re: Bl... Rick Hillegas
- Re: Regression Filter (was Re: Bl... Kathey Marsden
- Re: Regression Filter (was Re: Bl... Dyre . Tjeldvoll
- Re: Regression Filter (was Re: Bl... Rick Hillegas
- Re: Blockers and 10.4 Dyre . Tjeldvoll
- Re: Blockers and 10.4 Dag H. Wanvik
- Re: Blockers and 10.4 Myrna van Lunteren
- Heads up: pending commit will req... Dag H. Wanvik
- Re: Blockers and 10.4 Dyre . Tjeldvoll
- Re: Blockers and 10.4 Myrna van Lunteren
- Re: Blockers and 10.4 Dyre . Tjeldvoll
- HighValueFixCandidates (was Re: B... Kathey Marsden
- Re: HighValueFixCandidates Dyre . Tjeldvoll
- Re: HighValueFixCandidates (was R... Myrna van Lunteren
- Re: HighValueFixCandidates (was R... Kathey Marsden
- Re: Blockers and 10.4 Dyre . Tjeldvoll
