Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Ok, as you may have noticed I have updated the HighValueFixCandidates >> page with a status column. (Most are still open unfortunately). For now >> I have just created a link from the Bug fixing section of the 10.4 wiki >> page. >> >> > I tend to think it is best to remove the resolved and perhaps even in > progress issues from the list. I think it should just be a list of > fix candidates. Otherwise the list gets too long to be useful.
Ok, makes sense. Should DERBY-3230 be removed as well? It isn't in progress but it is assigned to you and has a patch ready for review AFAICT? -- dt
