This is great. I know it will make my time manning the booth more enjoyable. :)
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:16:02PM -0700, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> Thanks Stephen and Aaron. The attached uses Stephen's modification of
> Aaron's wording.
>
> On 01/06/2016 11:44 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> > If you want clarity and brevity, "...give it to us at the booth" is a
> > good compromise, I think.
> >
> > On January 7, 2016 4:45:42 AM GMT+01:00, Aaron Wolf
> > <aa...@snowdrift.coop> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Michael!
> >
> > I think your wording is improved, but maybe "…one of us at the booth"
> > just for clarity?
> >
> > Otherwise, I think it's good to go, but just needs to update the screen
> > shots to match whatever we have at the time we print in about two weeks.
> >
> > On 01/06/2016 03:50 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> >
> > On 01/05/2016 02:09 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> >
> > <snip> Looking over the screen-shots already, and in light
> > of discussion about metaphors, I propose we clean up the
> > wording (which wasn't carefully thought through yet)
> > first. * how about "Join us!" instead of "Join us in
> > setting…" ? * maybe for now we drop the "Let's clear the
> > path…" line? (although I like the clear-the-path for the
> > metaphor, I don't like the rest of that line) * I was
> > emphasizing this more before, but I'm going to push for it
> > a little more strongly now: I think we should use the term
> > "public goods" in our introductory context (and thus the
> > term will be there for people to provide feedback about).
> > It's the best, most accurate term, and the question is
> > whether it comes across clearly, hence feedback forms like
> > this…
> >
> > I agree about "public goods". (I think this discussion fits
> > better in the other thread ("4 issues priority") so I'll reply
> > there soon.)
> >
> > <snip> Two minor notes: * I don't really like the title
> > case on the tent
> >
> > I've changed it to sentence case.
> >
> > * The "Now please discuss" sounds a bit too strongly
> > imperative, like it isn't optional, you must now do this,
> > even with the please. Not sure how to improve, maybe just
> > put underneath the "optional" heading or have another
> > "optional" marker?
> >
> > I see your point but I don't want it under "Optional". It's
> > really supposed to be an integral part of the feedback process
> > whenever possible, though I certainly don't want people to
> > feel pressured to stay and chat if they don't want to. How
> > about this?: *Thank you!* Now please give this to one of us.
> > If possible, we'd love to discuss it with you to make sure we
> > fully understand your feedback and answer all your questions.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > I'll get the fonts installed on my computer.
> >
> > Overall, I think this will be really helpful, great work,
> > thanks!
> >
> > Glad you think so - you're welcome! Best, Michael
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Design mailing list Design@lists.snowdrift.coop
> > https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/design
> >
> > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Design mailing list
> > Design@lists.snowdrift.coop
> > https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/design
> _______________________________________________
> Design mailing list
> Design@lists.snowdrift.coop
> https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/design
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list Design@lists.snowdrift.coop https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/design
