On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:55:44AM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote: > On 01.08.2016 23:30, Michael Siepmann wrote: > > We discussed this in today's meeting. Here's a revised mockup, > > also attached in .ods format. This shows payment processing fees, > > two successive months of carry-over, and an example where a pledge > > was suspended: > > > > Thanks for clarifying via the mockup. I think it can be simplified > in several ways: > > https://snowdrift.sylphs.net/prototypes/mray/#history_page > > * a pledge value/month next to a total/month isn't necessary. It > only matters what you actually paid that month. So I would only show > one sum/month.
This is different from how all receipts and bills work, which show the sum-of-goods subtotal, then any fees and taxes, then a final total. Do we want to keep that just so it's more familiar? > * items that did not contribute to a months spending can be omitted for > clarity. Hm. I guess we should ask, is the purpose of this page to show *just* payment history? I don't think so. I think it is a history of participation within the mechanism. In that case, omitting items that don't contribute leads to a *lack* of clarity. Also, our hope is that we will be able to sum up a patron's contributions to all their projects, so they would only be hit by a single payment charge. In that case, it is impossible to get charged in April, but have other donations roll forward from April to May. Either a patron contributes to *all* their projects in a month, or they contribute to none of them. So: whether there is one project, or many projects, there is only one thing that matters: What do we show for a month where a patron is pledged, and contributes, but is not charged? > Suspended projects are not treated different as non-pledged and should > not show up specially. Notifications can be used to communicate all details. I think the same critique applies. If this page is to show a history of participation, suspended projects need to show up. > * I also like keeping the history tab consistent with the running months > matching tab. +1. FYI, I have created a US to track this story, and have pasted in the mockups so far. https://tree.taiga.io/project/snowdrift/us/454 I've named it according to my understanding that we are talking about a history of participation rather than just a history of payments, but please consider that point "open for discussion" still. :)
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list Design@lists.snowdrift.coop https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/design