On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:09:47AM -0600, Michael Siepmann wrote: > On 08/09/2016 07:23 AM, Stephen Michel wrote: > > > <snip> > > I agree with Michael here, but there is a limit. Imagine a user > > who pledges to many projects which are then suspended as they > > grow, but who is also lazy and leaves the pledges suspended > > rather than dropping them. Their history could become bloated with > > (imo) useless information as the months run by. > > > > I think the proper place to tackle this is: if a user has not > > reinstated a suspended pledge within 3 (?) months, it should be > > automatically dropped. Apologies if we've already had this > > conversation; I do remember talking about it but not this > > particular facet, and mobile makes it hard to go back and check. > > This seems like a good idea to me. I think we should notify them > with some reasonable notice, e.g. a brief email 2 weeks before it > will be dropped. Also they'll of course have been notified when it > was initially auto-suspended. (In both cases they might be able to > opt out of these notifications, but I certainly think the default > should be to be notified of these situations.)
Truly, this question was discussed to death some time ago. :P Sadly I don't recall what the outcome was. Aaron, maybe you remember?
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list Design@lists.snowdrift.coop https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/design