On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:09:47AM -0600, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> On 08/09/2016 07:23 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> > <snip>
> > I agree with Michael here, but there is a limit. Imagine a user
> > who pledges to many projects which are then suspended as they
> > grow, but who is also lazy  and leaves the pledges suspended
> > rather than dropping them. Their history could become bloated with
> > (imo) useless information as the months run by.
> >
> > I think the proper place to tackle this is: if a user has not
> > reinstated a suspended pledge within 3 (?) months, it should be
> > automatically dropped. Apologies if we've already had this
> > conversation; I do remember talking about it but not this
> > particular facet, and mobile makes it hard to go back and check.
> This seems like a good idea to me.  I think we should notify them
> with some reasonable notice, e.g. a brief email 2 weeks before it
> will be dropped.  Also they'll of course have been notified when it
> was initially auto-suspended.  (In both cases they might be able to
> opt out of these notifications, but I certainly think the default
> should be to be notified of these situations.)

Truly, this question was discussed to death some time ago. :P Sadly I
don't recall what the outcome was.

Aaron, maybe you remember?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Design mailing list

Reply via email to