Jeffrey Harris wrote:
My position on this one:
Per item access control: PPD Ok, Chandler ?, Cosmo Ok
is that we'd need to find a cheap solution for the case I mention here:
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-March/006597.html
which I think reduces to "Not OK".
Hi Jeffrey,
I'm a bit confused. I thought Brian said this case wasn't a problem:
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-March/006598.html
Brian Moseley wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Jeffrey Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 1. Mimi shares an event to osaf.us, then she emails it to Morgen
>> 2. Morgen puts the event in a collection he's sharing on osaf.us
>> 3. Morgen attempts to sync the collection and it fails unexpectedly
>
> this won't currently cause a failure. when morgen syncs, cosmo finds
> the item in mimi's collection and adds the item to morgen's
> collection. it also applies any changes to the item that morgen made
> locally, meaning that the item changes for mimi too.
Cheers,
Katie
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
