Hi Katie, > I'm a bit confused. I thought Brian said this case wasn't a problem: > http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-March/006598.html
>> this won't currently cause a failure. when morgen syncs, cosmo finds >> the item in mimi's collection and adds the item to morgen's >> collection. it also applies any changes to the item that morgen made >> locally, meaning that the item changes for mimi too. I interpreted what Brian was saying as meaning "Right now we don't have per-item access controls, so this isn't a problem." But it wouldn't work (without more effort) if we added per-item access controls. Is that right, Brian? Sincerely, Jeffrey _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
