I'm not sure this is worth fixing.
Pieter would you prefer to not be able to share the OOTB collections
at all? Or would you prefer to live with duped OOTB collections when
sharing with yourself?
Is anybody else sharing any OOTB collections? With yourself, or with
others?
Morgen, how much work is the enhancement to Dump and Reload to match
up OOTB collections with one another?
Mimi
On May 11, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Morgen Sagen wrote:
On May 11, 2007, at 3:19 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
Morgen? If you use Reload to migrate, will your shared OOTB
collections rationalize themselves with the OOTB collections in
the new version of Chandler?
Interesting - I could have sworn that in the past the OOTB
collections were not shareable. Now that they apparently are, this
causes a problem for dump and reload. Without going too deep into
engineering details, basically a shared OOTB collection will not
survive a dump and reload. The items that were in it before the
dump will still be there after the reload, but technically the new
OOTB collection is *not* the old one, and thus it won't be hooked
up correctly in terms of sharing.
Either we have to disable the sharing of OOTB collections, or dump
and reload needs to be enhanced.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
