Morgen? I was asking about non-shared OOTB collections. They don't
dupe themselves when you reload do they?
Assuming that's true, I propose that we live with what we have today
and I will log a bug to look into making it so that shared OOTB
collections don't dupe themselves post-Preview.
Mimi
On May 12, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Morgen Sagen wrote:
On May 12, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Mimi Yin wrote:
oooh, Does this mean that non-shared OOTB collections will behave
this way too? Will you always end up with 2 sets of OOTB
collections when you Reload? I didn't notice that before. Or is
this unique to shared collections because they need to maintain
the same UUID to be recognized on the server.
Mimi
A user-created collection (non-OOTB) will not have any problem. If
you dump a non-OOTB shared collection, upon restoring it will have
the same UUID it had before (and as it is on the server) and be
properly hooked up to sharing.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
